<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CoreTrace WhiteSpace&#187; CoreTrace WhiteSpace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coretraceblogs.com/tag/signatures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coretraceblogs.com</link>
	<description>The Application Whitelisting and Security Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:33:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Patching and Signatures Can&#8217;t Keep Up With Today&#8217;s Threats</title>
		<link>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2009-09/patching-and-signatures-cant-keep-up-with-todays-threats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2009-09/patching-and-signatures-cant-keep-up-with-todays-threats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Toney Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blacklisting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endpoint security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rational transition to whitelisting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitelisting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivirus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitelist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coretraceblogs.com/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Microsoft issued an advisory on a new vulnerability with the IIS FTP service. This vulnerability already has a published exploit and can result in allowing the attacker to execute unauthorized code on the target. Details of the vulnerability are available at the US-CERT website. If you have an anonymous account on your ftp [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.coretraceblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/iStock_stopwatch-303x201.jpg" alt="Patching and signatures can&#039;t keep up with new threats" title="Patching and signatures can&#039;t keep up with new threats" width="303" height="201" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-482" />Last week Microsoft issued an advisory on a <a href="http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1367020,00.html" target="_blank">new vulnerability with the IIS FTP service</a>. This vulnerability already has a published exploit and can result in allowing the attacker to execute unauthorized code on the target. Details of the vulnerability are available at the <a href="http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/276653" target="_blank">US-CERT website</a>. If you have an anonymous account on your ftp server then you are especially at risk because no theft of credentials would be needed to execute this exploit.</p>
<p>To me the key to this issue is that a fix won&#8217;t be included in today&#8217;s Microsoft security patch release. There simply wasn&#8217;t enough time to identify, code and test the patch before it was released. Microsoft complained that the security researcher didn&#8217;t report the vulnerability responsibly. While this may be true, it certainly highlights the weakness of a desktop security plan that relies on patching and antivirus signatures.<span id="more-479"></span></p>
<p>Time is the issue. Last week <a href="http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2009-09/time-to-start-over-on-desktop-security/" target="_blank">John Pescatore of Gartner Group wrote we need to start over on desktop security</a> and he&#8217;s right. The pace of security exploitation is simply too fast to expect operational procedures to fix things. It is time for a serious discussion about a complete shift in the way we protect our critical endpoints.</p>
<ul>
<li>We need a system that can protect against threats rather than react to them.</li>
<li>We need a system that doesn&#8217;t significantly degrade the performance of our significant IT investments.</li>
<li>We need a system that allows our users to deal with advancing technology and doesn&#8217;t disrupt the end user experience.</li>
</ul>
<p>Application whitelisting can meet these needs. It&#8217;s time to begin discussing how the transition will take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2009-09/patching-and-signatures-cant-keep-up-with-todays-threats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
