<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tale of Two DoDs: U.S. and Australian cybersecurity plans differ in depth and usefulness&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2011-08/a-tale-of-two-dods-u-s-and-australian-cybersecurity-plans-differ-in-depth-and-usefulness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2011-08/a-tale-of-two-dods-u-s-and-australian-cybersecurity-plans-differ-in-depth-and-usefulness/</link>
	<description>The Application Whitelisting and Security Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:40:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Making &#8220;Shady RAT&#8221; Useful: An Open Letter to McAfee, Symantec &#38; the Australian DoD&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2011-08/a-tale-of-two-dods-u-s-and-australian-cybersecurity-plans-differ-in-depth-and-usefulness/#comment-19510</link>
		<dc:creator>Making &#8220;Shady RAT&#8221; Useful: An Open Letter to McAfee, Symantec &#38; the Australian DoD&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coretraceblogs.com/?p=3409#comment-19510</guid>
		<description>[...] this week, I wrote a post comparing the  cybersecurity strategies of the United States and Australian Departments of Defense. In that post, I applauded the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week, I wrote a post comparing the  cybersecurity strategies of the United States and Australian Departments of Defense. In that post, I applauded the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT Keating</title>
		<link>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2011-08/a-tale-of-two-dods-u-s-and-australian-cybersecurity-plans-differ-in-depth-and-usefulness/#comment-19448</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coretraceblogs.com/?p=3409#comment-19448</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much, Richard. Coming from a researcher and author as steeped in the cyberwar discussion as you are, I truly appreciate it.  I think the US security folks are far better prepared and far more proactive in their consideration of new approaches than the &quot;Department of Defense Strategy for Operating in Cyberspace&quot; document shows.  I am sure it is a limitation of the document&#039;s messaging objective, but I really liked the thoroughness of the Australian plan and felt it needed more exposure.  

Thanks again.  

JT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much, Richard. Coming from a researcher and author as steeped in the cyberwar discussion as you are, I truly appreciate it.  I think the US security folks are far better prepared and far more proactive in their consideration of new approaches than the &#8220;Department of Defense Strategy for Operating in Cyberspace&#8221; document shows.  I am sure it is a limitation of the document&#8217;s messaging objective, but I really liked the thoroughness of the Australian plan and felt it needed more exposure.  </p>
<p>Thanks again.  </p>
<p>JT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stiennon</title>
		<link>http://www.coretraceblogs.com/2011-08/a-tale-of-two-dods-u-s-and-australian-cybersecurity-plans-differ-in-depth-and-usefulness/#comment-19447</link>
		<dc:creator>Stiennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coretraceblogs.com/?p=3409#comment-19447</guid>
		<description>Brilliant comparison JT.   I just returned from addressing the Australian Defense Magazine&#039;s first Cybersecurity Summit in Canberra.  The Australian presenters seemed to accept that the US was ahead of Australia in cyber preparedness. The US presenters were there to share their vast wisdom. Yet, as you point out, Australia has actually been more clear headed and strategic about cyber defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant comparison JT.   I just returned from addressing the Australian Defense Magazine&#8217;s first Cybersecurity Summit in Canberra.  The Australian presenters seemed to accept that the US was ahead of Australia in cyber preparedness. The US presenters were there to share their vast wisdom. Yet, as you point out, Australia has actually been more clear headed and strategic about cyber defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

